Furthermore, the principle conveyed in our students’ science classes is unable to verify as trueparts of reality that we all take for granted on a daily basis. For example, how could a scientist prove by this principle that he is not living in a dream world? This may seem weird to think about, but there is no way for a scientist to prove that he hasn’t been taken captive by aliens, induced into a permanent coma, and hooked up to a machine that creates an alternative dream world for him to experience as if it were reality (cf. The Matrix movie). Someone may object, “That’s ridiculous – of course I am not living in a dream world!” The point, however, is that there is no experiment or test that someone can perform that would be able to provethat the world he is living in is a false one. To insist, therefore, that the only way you can know something is true is if you can prove it through observations and tests is absurd. Here again the (secular) scientist must have faith – but faith in what?The Evolution Issue, Part 2
Furthermore, the principle conveyed in our students’ science classes is unable to verify as trueparts of reality that we all take for granted on a daily basis. For example, how could a scientist prove by this principle that he is not living in a dream world? This may seem weird to think about, but there is no way for a scientist to prove that he hasn’t been taken captive by aliens, induced into a permanent coma, and hooked up to a machine that creates an alternative dream world for him to experience as if it were reality (cf. The Matrix movie). Someone may object, “That’s ridiculous – of course I am not living in a dream world!” The point, however, is that there is no experiment or test that someone can perform that would be able to provethat the world he is living in is a false one. To insist, therefore, that the only way you can know something is true is if you can prove it through observations and tests is absurd. Here again the (secular) scientist must have faith – but faith in what?


